云服务器免费试用

金山云怎么样好用吗?金山云服务器真实测评

VPS测评 0 1568

最近,金山云优惠活动,推出的活动机型超级划算!2核4G5M带宽的云服务器仅288元一年!不过获得购买资格比较费劲一些,需要自己建团,然后有人入团且购买服务器后,团长才有资格!288元购买,原价需要2058元多!

有不少童鞋已经跃跃欲试了!童鞋不用着急购买,先看完本文测评再下手吧!!云服务器测评内容全是博主亲测,商家后来配置变更/网络变化,博主不在变更本文内容!内容仅供参考!!

金山云怎么样好用吗?金山云服务器真实测评

官网地址:点击进入最新活动

机器配置:

型号:基础型E1

CPU:2核

内存:4G

磁盘:20G(SSD)

带宽:5M

IPv4:1个

数据中心:北京,上海,广州

操作系统:Linux / Windows

价格:最低288元一年

购买地址:https:///go/ksyun

配置测试:

CPU这个型号被修改了,和客服沟通后说是Intel Xeon E5!

12345678910111213———————————————————————-CPU model            : Ksyun Virtual CPU(ksyun-cpu64)Number of cores      : 1CPU frequency        : 2599.998 MHzTotal size of Disk   : 20.0 GB (2.4 GB Used)Total amount of Mem  : 1838 MB (66 MB Used)Total amount of Swap : 0 MB (0 MB Used)System uptime        : 0 days, 0 hour 6 minLoad average         : 0.01, 0.15, 0.12OS                   : CentOS 7.6.1810Arch                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)Kernel               : 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64———————————————————————-

磁盘IO

平均IO为 839MB/s,这个IO波动有点大!

1234I/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 526 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 967 MB/sI/O Speed( 1.0GB )   : 1.0 GB/sAverage I/O Speed    : 839.0 MB/s

测试IP

120.92.123.3

网络延迟

国内延迟不错!国外也还不错!

最快北京[多线] 3ms / 最慢新加坡 241ms / 平均42.9ms

线路最快节点最慢节点平均响应
电信山东枣庄18ms云南昆明78ms34.6ms
多线北京3ms广东深圳46ms23.4ms
联通天津6ms福建福州42ms25.7ms
移动江苏常州28ms浙江金华37ms33.8ms
海外中国香港41ms新加坡241ms87ms

网络丢包

测试时间下午7点左右!国内表现良好!境外大部分地址丢包还不算太严重!


网络速度

上行速度基本符合宣传的5Mbit/s, 下行速度应该是 50Mbit/s左右!

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536测试节点          上传速度           下载速度Speedtest.net    6.18 Mbit/s       54.71 Mbit/sFast.com         0.00 Mbit/s       32.5 Mbit/sNanning       CT 7.18 Mbit/s       43.04 Mbit/sGuangzhou 5G  CT 6.56 Mbit/s       43.63 Mbit/sChongqing     CT 6.32 Mbit/s       53.46 Mbit/sChangsha      CT 6.30 Mbit/s       51.54 Mbit/sWuhan         CT 6.50 Mbit/s       61.52 Mbit/sHefei 5G      CT 5.82 Mbit/s       49.90 Mbit/sHangzhou      CT 6.67 Mbit/s       41.19 Mbit/sNanjing 5G    CT 6.33 Mbit/s       52.88 Mbit/sShanghai      CT 7.08 Mbit/s       44.25 Mbit/sSuzhou 5G     CT 6.75 Mbit/s       50.81 Mbit/sLianyungang5G CT 6.65 Mbit/s       51.34 Mbit/sGuangzhou 5G  CU 5.94 Mbit/s       50.74 Mbit/sChangsha      CU 6.34 Mbit/s       62.99 Mbit/sFuzhou        CU 7.02 Mbit/s       48.97 Mbit/sTianjin 5G    CU 4.18 Mbit/s       58.95 Mbit/sChengdu       CU 6.44 Mbit/s       47.31 Mbit/sNanning       CU 6.54 Mbit/s       62.24 Mbit/sWuhan         CU 6.07 Mbit/s       47.35 Mbit/sHefei         CU 6.33 Mbit/s       55.88 Mbit/sBeijing       CU 5.67 Mbit/s       58.60 Mbit/sNanjing       CU 4.49 Mbit/s       42.87 Mbit/sShangHai 5G   CU 5.54 Mbit/s       29.22 Mbit/sChangchun     CU 6.40 Mbit/s       61.42 Mbit/sXi an         CU 5.09 Mbit/s       61.30 Mbit/sHarbin        CM 7.15 Mbit/s       51.06 Mbit/sZhenJiang     CM 5.15 Mbit/s       55.22 Mbit/sWuxi 5G       CM 6.34 Mbit/s       27.22 Mbit/sNanjing 5G    CM 4.44 Mbit/s       18.87 Mbit/sNingbo 5G     CM 5.36 Mbit/s       50.53 Mbit/sHefei 5G      CM 5.28 Mbit/s       48.56 Mbit/sChangSha 5G   CM 6.85 Mbit/s       62.27 Mbit/sGuangzhou     CM 6.47 Mbit/s       38.86 Mbit/sHangzhou      CM 6.84 Mbit/s       73.52 Mbit/s

内存测试

内存能分配到3.5G左右!

1234567891011123480MB allocated3490MB allocated3500MB allocated3510MB allocated3520MB allocated3530MB allocated3540MB allocated3550MB allocated3560MB allocated3570MB allocated3580MB allocatedKilled

DB测试

MyISAM引擎 100 并发查询时间: 1.386秒

MyISAM引擎 1000并发查询时间:2.029秒

InnoDB引擎 100 并发查询时间: 1.093秒

InnoDB引擎 1000并发查询时间:1.95秒

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031BenchmarkRunning for engine myisamAverage number of seconds to run all queries: 1.378 secondsMinimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.344 secondsMaximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.438 secondsNumber of clients running queries: 100Average number of queries per client: 20BenchmarkRunning for engine myisamAverage number of seconds to run all queries: 2.026 secondsMinimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.976 secondsMaximum number of seconds to run all queries: 2.086 secondsNumber of clients running queries: 1000Average number of queries per client: 2BenchmarkRunning for engine innodbAverage number of seconds to run all queries: 1.092 secondsMinimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.070 secondsMaximum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.119 secondsNumber of clients running queries: 100Average number of queries per client: 20BenchmarkRunning for engine innodbAverage number of seconds to run all queries: 1.888 secondsMinimum number of seconds to run all queries: 1.668 secondsMaximum number of seconds to run all queries: 2.295 secondsNumber of clients running queries: 1000Average number of queries per client: 2


性能跑分

跑分仅为:550.6!!

123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445========================================================================   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)   System: vm10-0-0-24: GNU/Linux   OS: GNU/Linux — 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 — #1 SMP Mon Jul 29 17:46:05 UTC 2019   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”UTF-8″, collate=”UTF-8″)   CPU 0: Ksyun Virtual CPU(ksyun-cpu64) (5200.0 bogomips)          x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSCALL/SYSRET   23:18:59 up  5:36,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.05; runlevel 3————————————————————————Benchmark Run: Fri Jun 19 2020 23:18:59 – 23:47:051 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of testsDhrystone 2 using register variables       33374627.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Double-Precision Whetstone                     4185.3 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)Execl Throughput                               2150.0 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        221745.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           55442.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        694503.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)Pipe Throughput                              293374.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Pipe-based Context Switching                  80047.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)Process Creation                               6818.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3372.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    462.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)System Call Overhead                         304404.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEXDhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   33374627.6   2859.9Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4185.3    761.0Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2150.0    500.0File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     221745.0    560.0File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      55442.9    335.0File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     694503.1   1197.4Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     293374.4    235.8Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      80047.2    200.1Process Creation                                126.0       6818.1    541.1Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3372.1    795.3Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        462.7    771.1System Call Overhead                          15000.0     304404.8    202.9                                                                   ========System Benchmarks Index Score                                         550.6======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======


并发测试

50KB静态页面测试 并发 ≈ 1000

请求服务器:腾讯云重庆云服务器延迟50毫秒

12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637Server Software:        nginxServer Hostname:        120.92.123.1Server Port:            80Document Path:          /50kb.htmlDocument Length:        51276 bytesConcurrency Level:      1000Time taken for tests:   95.562 secondsComplete requests:      1000Failed requests:        162   (Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 162, Exceptions: 0)Write errors:           0Total transferred:      50001600 bytesHTML transferred:       49749600 bytesRequests per second:    10.46 [#/sec] (mean)Time per request:       95562.204 [ms] (mean)Time per request:       95.562 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)Transfer rate:          510.97 [Kbytes/sec] receivedConnection Times (ms)              min  mean[+/-sd] median   maxConnect:       41   53   4.8     54      66Processing:   190 48434 17302.8  49469   95415Waiting:       43 4486 10806.9    711   80115Total:        237 48487 17302.9  49512   95461Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)  50%  49512  66%  56441  75%  60386  80%  62632  90%  71801  95%  76680  98%  82183  99%  84973100%  95461 (longest request)


最后总结:

以下是马甲客观评价!本文测试大概用了3天的时间!

服务器性能:CPU官宣是Intel Xeon E5系列处理器。但是性能跑分非常不理想!

网络情况:网络情况还不错!

价格情况:价格算是超便宜了。

计费方式:按月/年计费。

支付方式:支付宝,微信,银行卡。

能否建站: 可以,并发能力表现良好。

能否趴强:不支持。

工单服务:支持工单,也支持在线客服,回复还是比较快的(这个比较不错!)。

商家口碑:暂时没发现特别的黑历史。

能否退货:特价机型非特殊原因不退。

控制面板:支持监控统计(比较简单),防火墙,SSH密钥,弹性IP,自定义系统镜像,快照(付费)。

备注内容:经过和客服沟通建站的话需要备案接入,也有童鞋说不用接入就能用。

声明:本文内容由网友自发贡献,本站不承担相应法律责任。对本内容有异议或投诉,请联系2913721942@qq.com核实处理,我们将尽快回复您,谢谢合作!
若转载请注明出处: 金山云怎么样好用吗?金山云服务器真实测评
本文地址: https://solustack.com/7588.html

相关推荐:

网友留言:

我要评论:

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。